Rethinking Subsidy Reform in South Asia: How Governments Can Better Support People
11/08/2026 02:25 PM
South Asia shows subsidy reform works best when support is better targeted, institutions are stronger, and vulnerable people are protected.
Governments are seeking to improve farming methods, infrastructure, and access to finance, rather than subsidizing fertilizers, seeds, and fuel. Photo by Bishnu Sarangi
Subsidy reform is often seen as raising prices and cutting support. In practice, it is more about transforming how governments provide support so that it is better targeted, efficient, and more sustainable in the long term. Experience from South Asia shows that subsidy reform works best when it is part of wider efforts to improve public finances, strengthen institutions, and protect vulnerable people.
One clear lesson is that subsidies are not just about pricing. They run through tax systems, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), financial markets, and local service providers.
In Bangladesh, fiscal and governance reforms have targeted ineffective tax breaks and exemptions, wasteful public spending, and reducing losses from SOEs. In India, better budget and accounting systems have made it easier to track subsidies, while digital cash transfers have improved targeting for food, energy, and income support. Municipal finance reforms in Indian cities have focused on stronger property taxes, more realistic user fees for urban services and their wider collection to reduce the need for subsidies.
Hidden subsidies in the financial sector are another important frontier. State-owned banks have long provided cheap credit to favored sectors, often backed by guarantees when loans go bad. In Bangladesh banking sector reforms aimed at monitoring the quality of credit to reduce the need for government support. In Bhutan, India, and Sri Lanka, programs are shifting from broad-based subsidized credit toward market-based finance for small businesses with guarantees from the government to partially cover the banks’ lending risks.
Energy remains a central focus of reform. Rather than relying only on tariff hikes, which can raise concerns over affordability, countries are tackling the drivers of high costs of energy generation.
In Maldives, investments in renewable energy are gradually reducing reliance on fossil fuel as the main source of electricity. In Nepal and India, investments in energy network infrastructure have helped lower the transmission and distribution losses. In Bangladesh, grid modernization and smart meters are improving billing and collection. Sri Lanka shows how adjustments in tariffs to cover costs can work when combined with restructuring and better governance of state-owned public utilities.
The focus in agriculture and food systems is also evolving. In Bhutan, support has moved from recurrent subsidies for fertilizers and seeds toward measures that raise farmers’ productivity, such as better access to credit, more resilient production methods, and integration with agro-businesses. In Nepal, irrigation and agriculture programs have combined infrastructure with grants and credit guarantees that help farmers invest without long-term subsidy dependence.
Sector-based approaches in tourism, trade, and industry show how better rules can reduce subsidies. In Sri Lanka’s tourism sector, ad hoc tax breaks have been replaced with clearer, rules‑based frameworks that distort markets less and are more predictable for investors.
Trade and industry programs in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh are moving to replace one-off subsidies and discretionary incentives with more transparent support systems and rules for private investors.
Throughout, subsidy reform plays a key role in strengthening old-age pension systems, building more safety nets to shield poor and vulnerable households, and improving the coverage of health systems. Bangladesh and Sri Lanka are consolidating overlapping assistance schemes and using digital tools to improve targeting of eligible groups. India’s large digital platforms have enabled more precise delivery of benefits across multiple programs.
Nepal and Sri Lanka have redesigned subsidies to be more integrated within broader nutrition, poverty alleviation, and social safety net programs. In Maldives, reforms in health financing and insurance aim at more efficient spending without harming access to affordable health care.
Subsidies are politically sensitive in nature, and South Asia’s experience shows the importance of incremental approaches.
Subsidy reform is about making support smarter. By shifting from open‑ended subsidies to well‑targeted support and by investing in productivity, infrastructure, and better rules, countries are aiming to protect vulnerable people, improve services, and use scarce public resources more wisely.
Better governance of state-owned utilities is critical, alongside rationalizing subsidies. Digital IDs, integrated social registries, smart meters, and modern financial management systems are helping cut leakages and strengthen accountability. This integrated approach can support fiscal sustainability, encourage private investment, and build resilience to both long‑term development challenges and future shocks.
Tuấn Anh (Via ADB)
Sickness
Work Injury and Occupational Disease
Survivor’s
Old-age
Maternity
Unemployment
Medical (Health Insurance)
Certificate of coverage
VSS - ISSA Guidelines on Social Security